Friday, July 3, 2009

Economic Edge Reader Provides Spam(ish) Thoughts and Views!

Richard, a reader and writer of economic spam (lol – hey, I fall into that category!) from the U.K., sent me the following email that I think is spot on in many ways – here it is with a little punctuation editing by me, but otherwise as he wrote it…

2 July 2009

Fierce bear market rallies are designed to tempt investors and traders back into the market, and the second quarter rally this year has been brilliant in producing feel good factors that include economic greenshoots and,"Hey, some of my stocks have actually got back to cost price!” In the coming summer months the markets could surge higher, making valuations even more expensive than they are already. More likely is a sideways chop into the main autumn/winter event, which is a retest of the lows (ASIA/CHINA possibly excepted), and perhaps even lower lows to complete the normal three year bear market cycle that comes with depressions. A worthwhile bet is that the March/June rally is over, that the next leg down has already started, and that "the investor who loses the least in a bear market wins!” Bonds, cash, gold, silver and commodities generally continue to be the best components of any normal "portfolio,” and hopefully it is managed far away from the big "managers of others peoples money.”

The fear of inflation seems to make for a good headline these days, what with Quantative Easing and exploding money supply. However, shrewd investors recall that the real inflation has come and gone. In the years 2002 to 2007 the price of literally everything exploded upwards-STOCKS, CREDIT, CDOs, CDSWAPS, HEDGE FUNDS, SUB PRIME MORTGAGES, CONDOS, OIL, GOLD, SILVER (all other real and agricultural commodities), REAL ESTATE/COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, FOOD, SALARIES /WAGES/BONUSES, ANTIQUES/ART, Classic Cars..................(the list is endless)! In a debt deflation though there ain't no inflation (except in the wife’s shopping basket and the provision of public services), which is why all the asset classes of the 2002-2007 bull market have crashed. The experience of the 1920's Wall Street and 1990's Nikkei crashes is that global inflation will not be a problem for a very long time.

Back in 2005 when the activities of condo flippers in Florida, etc. became obvious to all and sundry (with the exception of most of the financial community), a number of brilliant and original thinkers began to check out the source of their finance, stumbled upon the sub-prime mortgage market, and after further intensive education on this nether world of finance, placed huge bets that the whole house of cards had to collapse eventually. Being short the biggest game in town for a couple of years is a lonely and very expensive place to be, and it wasn't until 2007 that the first signs of peaking property values became apparent. Without being boring, the end of the story is now well documented history, and a few brave original thinkers made billions as the rest of our well regulated world came apart at the seams. Strange and annoying though it is, bear markets do occasionally throw up a "what goes around, comes around" scenario, and of course it has in 2008/2009 because those very same investors who made fortunes correctly shorting the banks, insurers/reinsurers have ended up owning them as taxpayers and depositors! How perverse is that!

Trillions of dollars have gone West in rescuing the Shadow Banking Industry, and respected economists (Black Swan [author Nassim Taleb ]) calculate that $40 to $70 trillion of further deleveraging has to occur before there is any real prospect of recovery. And this writer has been accused of being too bearish!! Back in September 2008 it was calculated that rather than bailing out the Shadow banks for literally trillions of taxpayer monies, twelve new universal banks could have been set up for $600 billion to $1.2 trillion, which could then have been leveraged 8 or 9 times. However it was decided that socializing the losses and privatizing future profits was the best way to restore stability to the financial system, taxpayer monies disappearing down a banking black hole from which they will never ever be repaid or be able to participate in past, present, or future profits. Capitalism normally rewards success and punishes failure, but in the world of modern banking the taxpayer takes the losses and the bankers take all the profits. This was not how it was meant to be, there should be safe boring conservative banks, and their should be private partnerships/investment banks taking well calculated risks with their own capital. Strange that the crippled Shadow Banking Industry, Central Bankers, Treasury Secretaries and politicians cannot see the error of their ways, instead they insist that the Universal Banks have the right to leverage their deposit base in pursuit of profits from products that even they don't understand. A modern version of Glass Steagall is one of the essential reforms that will not see the light of day, and the brilliant students of finance know full well the reasons why!

However, Barclays Bank was a great trade off the lows of 50p, thanks very much "EVIL Knievil!” Now that the details of the compensation package of the new CEO of RBS are in the public domain, it might be worth buying the shares at 40p,with a 20% stop loss at 32p. By having a trailing 20% stop loss if, as and when the shares moonshot to £2.50-£3.00 in the next few years, thereby making Mr. Stephen Hester another banking multi-zillionaire, taxpaying shareholders and depositors might finally reap some reward for rescuing this ghastly Scottish bank.


Well, I don’t know about the Barclays recommendation, but I don’t think we’ve reached overall market bottom yet! The rest of Richard’s musings are right on, not enough attention is given to the effects of the shadow banking system which is still unraveling.

Richard, welcome to the Edge, you're welcome around here anytime!

Dire Straights – Brothers in Arms:

Speech By Dr. David Bronner CEO Alabama Retirement Systems

Very lucid insights and predictions by a large retirement fund CEO (ht Steph on TF). Pay attention especially to what he says in points 1 and 2, he is spot on. “…one state after the other,” and “Within 120 to 150 days from now the commercial real estate market nationally begins to collapse as stores, malls, and shopping strips, and industrial plant have enough closures (store and plant) and loss of rental revenue to make them unable to pay their mortgages…”
Bronner Speaks in Tuscaloosa

Dr. David Bronner, CEO of the Alabama Retirement Systems, the 43rd largest investment fund in America, spoke at Rotary Club here yesterday. He is one of the most respected fund controllers in the United States today by his peers.

One of my grad school professors e-mailed me notes detailing what Bronner had to say:

1) Next month (July) California hits the wall financially, that will send a ripple effect across the US economy, AND over the next two years one state after the other will fall to it's knees financially as the federal government stimulus package ends by 2011. It has helped various states at different levels comparative to their economic condition. He says the stimulus package is what's been keeping the states alive for now...except for California which was in such terrible shape the stimulus package wasn't enough to really help them. "They go first" he said. Alabama would hit the wall in February of 2011, late in the game as Alabama is in better shape than other states. Bronner says Alabama might dodge the bullet if the economy revives enough by then. But, he doesn't really think things will improve enough by then to avoid a crisis. "It will be the largest economic crisis in the history of the State of Alabama." Bronner says Alabama will experience such significant shortfalls by 2011 that taxes will have to be raised substantially to avoid collapse...probably on property. And that practically all states will face a similar fate.

2) Within 120 to 150 days from now the commercial real estate market nationally begins to collapse as stores, malls, and shopping strips, and industrial plant have enough closures (store and plant) and loss of rental revenue to make them unable to pay their mortgages. They will start going into foreclosure unable to pay their mortgages in a significant way at that time creating a second wave of economic disaster starting three to four months from now.

3) Unless oil stays above $70 a barrel Russian and Mexican economics will begin to unravel as countries ("socio-economic collapse) economies require that much from oil to have an adequate revenue stream to feed their people and economies. AND, the only other big revenue stream for Mexico is illegal drugs sold in the their economy will intensify their focus on selling drugs in America as a result in order to survive if oil doesn't stay above $70...he said $90 would be better for them.

4) The US economy (according to Bronner) is today like a patient in the emergency room in the process of having a heart attack. He said people tend to think of it as being in the hospital for cancer or chronic disease. Without the huge Bush stimulus, and then the huge Obama stimulus, the economy would have already flat lined...(i.e. we'd be experiencing a Great Depression style economic collapse heading toward 25% unemployment or so as the tumble would have continued and intensified at an increasing rate, with the stock market hitting around 2,000) Bronner said the depth of the crisis was greater than ANYONE realized and agrees today, after learning the extent of the crisis, that the federal government simply had to start "shoveling" money at it to prevent a true and complete collapse of our economy. He said he, at first, was mad at this shoveling of money until he learned the truth about the amount of money necessary to prevent a total collapse which he believes would have happened.

5) Inflation will not arrive for 3 to 5 years as the economy is in a deflationary stage due to the economic plummet...and will not experience inflation until people start "buying things" again, and that's going to take while! He also believes 3 to 5 years is probably the term until true economic recovery establishes in the US and world economy.

6) China must start selling their products to people in their own country and paying their workers enough to buy them. This would increase their products prices, reducing their exports (and "besides they will lose interest in having more US dollars anyway") and enabling other countries (US) to compete with them.)

7) The greatest threat to the US economy is one of around 9 world events that could heap misery on top of misfortune at exactly the wrong time. A nuclear incident with N Korea, a plague, Israel attacking Iran (oil shock), or such could still throw the US economy into a Great Depression style situation. He said the greatest risk of this is anytime from now until the world economy gets somewhat back on it's 3 to 5 years.

I thought what Bronner had to say was interesting. He is definitely a credible and intelligent source (so is the professor that passed the notes along).

“Bronner said the depth of the crisis was greater than ANYONE realized and agrees today…”

Well, definitely not worse than WE here at the Economic Edge expect, that’s for sure!

China selling their cheap crap to their own people? Economic recovery inside of 3 years? Oil staying above $70? Nah, he didn't want to come right out and say it's not going to happen, but I have no such qualms... people and agencies counting on a quick economic recovery are dreaming and hoping for miracles!

Jefferson Airplane – Miracles (if only you believe in miracles):

India Questioning U.S. Dollar Dominance…

Three years ago talk about replacing the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency was met with great skepticism. Now India is joining Russia and China in opening talking about the problem of owning too many dollars. It would seem that the holders of dollars don’t particularly like our inability to pay our debts and our purposeful currency devaluation. Who would have figured?

Now the demise of our dollar is picking up momentum. Soon there will be a critical mass reached and when that happens the world’s central bankers, dominated by U.K. and U.S. central banks, will have THE proposal that will undoubtedly place them on the top of a new credit based new and bigger, more highly leveraged, never ending growth Ponzi currency/debt scheme! It’s coming fellow slaves, get ready.

India Joins Russia, China in Questioning U.S. Dollar Dominance

By Mark Deen and Isabelle Mas

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Suresh Tendulkar, an economic adviser to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, said he is urging the government to diversify its $264.6 billion foreign-exchange reserves and hold fewer dollars.

“The major part of Indian reserves are in dollars -- that is something that’s a problem for us,” Tendulkar, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, said in an interview today in Aix-en-Provence, France, where he was attending an economic conference.

Singh is preparing to join leaders from the Group of Eight industrialized nations -- the U.S., Japan, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Canada and Russia -- at a summit in Italy next week which is due to tackle the global economy. China and Brazil will also send representative to the G-8 summit.

As the talks have neared, China and Russia have stepped up calls for a rethink of how global currency reserves are composed and managed, underlining a power shift to emerging markets from the developed nations that spawned the financial crisis.

“There should be a system to maintain the stability of the major reserve currencies,” Former Chinese Vice Premier Zeng Peiyan said in a speech in Beijing today, highlighting the nation’s concerns about a global financial system dominated by the dollar.

Fiscal and current-account deficits must be supervised as “your currency is likely to become my problem,” said Zeng, who is now the head of a research center under the government’s top economic planning agency. The People’s Bank of China said June 26 that the International Monetary Fund should manage more of members’ reserves.

Russian Proposals

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has repeatedly called for creating a mix of regional reserve currencies as part of the drive to address the global financial crisis, while questioning the dollar’s future as a global reserve currency. Russia’s proposals for the Group of 20 major developed and developing nations summit in London in April included the creation of a supranational currency.

“We will resume” talks on the supranational currency proposal at the G-8 summit in L’Aquila on July 8-10, Medvedev aide Sergei Prikhodko told reporters in Moscow today.

Singh adviser Tendulkar said that big dollar holders face a “prisoner’s dilemma” in terms of managing their holdings. “That’s why I’m telling them to do this,” he said.

He also said that world currencies need to adjust to help unwind trade imbalances that have contributed to the global financial crisis.

“The major imbalances which led to the current situation, the current account surpluses and deficits, have to be addressed,” he said. “Currency adjustment is one thing that suggests itself.”

Emerging-Market Dependence

For all the complaints about the dollar, emerging markets such as India remain dependent on the currency of the U.S., the world’s largest economy and a $2.5 trillion export market. The IMF said June 30 that the share of dollars in global foreign- exchange reserves increased to 65 percent in the first three months of this year, the highest since 2007.

Tendulkar said that the matter needs to be taken up in international talks, and that it emphasizes the need for those talks to go beyond the traditional G-8.

“They can meet if they want to,” he said. “The G-20 has a wider role, has representation of the countries that are likely to lead the recovery process.”

While we can personally withdraw from the debt and market games the world’s central bankers are playing, NO ONE will be able to escape their Ponzi scheme entirely. That’s because they are indebting nations and the percentage of your work efforts STOLEN from your productive efforts will increase dramatically.

Then there are the “events” that follow certain economic events… See Martin Armstrong’s latest for more on that! Oh, you liked spending $3 trillion plus on an Iraq war fought in the name of 9/11 but really all about control and profits for the military industrial complex? Oil you say? Yes, you and I are now indebted for all that money but it will be the Chinese that profit as they are the ones who have inked the deal for Iraqi oil (ht Point):
And the winner of Iraq's oil is...China?
Yes, our currency is getting what it deserves. Actually it deserves far worse as America is bankrupt and has already began to default on her debts – that’s what “Quantitative Easing” is all about!

At some point in the not too distant future Americans are going to have to rise to the challenge of our founding fathers and our Constitution. That is IF we desire true Freedom…

Styx – Suite Madame Blue (America Patriotic):

Bank Failure Friday – Moved to Thursday, Seven Fall…

Now at 52 bank failures for the year, seven banks were seized by the FDIC, six of which were in Illinois. Pay particular attention to why those banks were seized and the “investments” in which they were participating:
Seven U.S. Banks Seized in Busiest Year for Closures Since 1992
By Ari Levy and Flynn McRoberts

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Six banks in Illinois and one in Texas were seized by regulators as the deepening financial crisis pushed the toll of failed U.S. lenders this year to 52, the most since 1992.

Twelve banks have failed this year in Illinois, the most of any state. The seven lenders seized yesterday, with total assets of $1.49 billion and deposits of $1.34 billion, were closed by state or federal regulators and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was named receiver, according to statements from the FDIC. Buyers were named for each of the closed institutions.

The Illinois banks are affiliates of Peotone Bank & Trust Co., in Peotone, Illinois, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) south of Chicago. The failures resulted primarily because of soured loans and losses on investments in collateralized debt obligations, the FDIC said. Illinois, with an unemployment rate above the national average, was one of seven states to begin the fiscal year without a spending plan.

“The six failed Illinois banks are all controlled by one family and followed a similar business model that created concentrated exposure in each institution,” the FDIC said. CDOs, which packaged bonds and loans into notes of varying risk and yield, lost money as real estate defaults soared.

Regulators this year have closed the most banks since the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1990s as lenders struggle with mounting losses on mortgages and commercial loans. The total for 2009 is more than double the 25 banks shuttered in 2008 and surpasses the 50 that were closed in 1993. The prior year there were 181 failures or government-assisted transactions.


The FDIC estimates yesterday’s seizures will cost its insurance fund $314.3 million. The regulator imposed an emergency fee in May to raise $5.6 billion to rebuild the fund, which has deteriorated in the past 18 months. More assessments are possible, the FDIC said.

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn, a Democrat, refused to sign a budget because lawmakers failed to approve raising the income tax. In his original $53 billion budget proposal in March, the governor sought personal and corporate tax increases to help eliminate an $11.6 billion deficit and maintain state services.

Chicago is 280 miles from Detroit, home to General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, which were forced into bankruptcy. Lear Corp., the Southfield, Michigan-based maker of automotive seats, announced plans yesterday to enter bankruptcy. The unemployment rate in Illinois was 10.1 percent in May, compared with 9.4 percent nationally.
‘A Mess’

“This is a mess,” said Jack Ablin, who oversees $60 billion as chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago. “We’re a manufacturing state and in the Midwest, so we’re influenced by the autos.”

In addition to CDOs, the failed banks were plagued by losses on commercial real estate loans. Founders Bank of Worth, the biggest of the Illinois banks seized yesterday, had $374 million in construction and commercial real estate loans as of March, accounting for 63 percent of the bank’s net loans and leases, according to a regulatory report.

Millennium State Bank of Texas, the Dallas-based bank taken over yesterday, had $67.5 million in such loans, or 81 percent of its total loans.

“The common denominator for most of the bank failures so far has been troubled construction loans,” said Matthew Anderson of Foresight Analytics, an Oakland, California-based real estate research firm. “There’s no easy way out with defaulted construction loans in today’s environment.”

The Illinois banks have a combined 29 branches, which will all open under new ownership by July 6, the FDIC said. Millennium’s lone office will open that day as a unit of Irvine- based State Bank of Texas.

The following table lists the banks that were seized yesterday. Asset and deposit figures are in millions of U.S. dollars.

Failed Bank Buyer Assets Deposits

Founders Bank PrivateBank & Trust 962.5 848.9 Worth, IL Chicago
First National First Financial 166 147 Danville, IL Terre Haute, IN
Millennium State State Bank of Texas 118 115 Dallas Irving
Rock River Bank Harvard State Bank 77 75.8 Oregon, IL Harvard, IL
Elizabeth State Bank Galena State Bank 55.5 50.4 Elizabeth, IL Galena, IL
John Warner State Bank of Lincoln 70 64 Clinton, IL Lincoln, IL
First State Bank First National 36 34 Winchester, IL Beardstown, IL

Collateralized Debt Obligations (derivatives) and Commercial Real Estate. This is a situation that is going to get much, much worse over time. The small local and regional banks’ exposure is immense as many funded enterprises that were larger than they should have been invested in, exposing themselves to too much risk. Investing in securitized debt is just silly for a small institution, again, many of them simply did not understand the risk involved.

As these small banks fail, their parts move up the food chain. Eventually those parts will find their way right back to the very institutions that created the derivatives mess in the first place. The debt needs to be cleared, as in defaulted, but so much of it has been moved onto the government roles that the government has now defaulted on her debt – that’s what “quantitative easing” is – when one can no longer finance their debts, and needs to issue more debt to remain cash solvent, then they are bankrupt and by printing money to buy one’s own debt, we have in fact defaulted to those who hold our debts as the money they will be paid back with is being devalued by that process. This creates a negative feedback loop, a death spiral of debt.

The FDIC is as INSOLVENT as the banks that it backstops. They have no real money as all their fees were added to the general fund and SPENT. Even their ledger balance is now wiped out and they are asking Congress to be replenished. The failure of our debt based system is now accelerating. Small bank failures are but one symptom. Hey, that’s what happens when you live life in the credit fast lane!

The Eagles – Life in the Fast Lane:

Martin Armstrong – The Counter Revolution of Iran…

Subtitled, “Is This the Start of a New Global Revolution? Contagion Part II,” Armstrong dives into the current events in Iran and relates them to HISTORY and to the REST OF THE WORLD.

Contagion, it may begin in the financial world, but it soon turns into what I call the “other events that tend to follow times of economic upheaval.” You know, civil disobedience, civil unrest, civil war, high levels of crime, and even outright war. Are we on that path now? Martin addresses these “other events,” so put on your thinking cap and enjoy the read:

*My apologies for the way this scan turned out. I do not control the process which begins with Martin typing on an IBM Selectric typewriter. The document then exits prison and finds its way to my source who scans them and converts the scanned document into a .pdf file. Yes, we could convert them and turn them into digital perfection, but again I think it’s important to keep in mind the conditions that Martin is working under. I for one appreciate his efforts and wish we could do more to get him back out into the world of digital perfection!

To PRINT, click “more,” then “print.” You can also click "more" then "save document" to open in YOUR .pdf viewer where you can either save or print.

Martin Armstrong Petitions U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder…

For those following the saga of Martin Armstrong’s legal battle, here is his latest petition versus the director of prisons, Harley Lappin, and the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder.

Sixty-nine pages long, Armstrong lays out the foundation of why he is falsely imprisoned. Doing so, he cites case history and discusses the rule of law which has obviously broken down in Martin’s case. If anyone reading this has any pull whatsoever with the legal system or via the political system, your help would be greatly appreciated as Armstrong fears that another attempt on his life could happen prior to gaining his release in 2011.

On a more humorous note, he has been writing so many appeals and petitions (which go mostly unanswered in regards to his arguments) that he is being nicknamed the “legal terrorist!” Funny how that works, if someone lays out a solid argument for why they are wrongly being imprisoned, they are ignored and then labeled a “terrorist…” Although in this case it’s obviously meant as a somewhat funny moniker, the underlying tone is still an attempt to discredit the reality of his situation which is VERY serious from his point of view.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Nassim Taleb – “We’re in the Middle of a Crash…”

The author of “The Black Swan” is simply telling the truth. Nails it when he talks about debt and the government’s erroneous handling of it.

Nassim Taleb – CNBC (9 minutes):

Blog Author Issues Economic “Warning…”

The author of the Arbitrary Vote site, emailed me with a link to his article “Warning” yesterday. It’s a good read, factual and filled with great graphics.

I would like to note that while he presents both a hyperinflationary outcome and deflationary spiral as possibilities, here I am going to emphasize that I’m sticking with my deflation now (possible spiral) inflation later (if our currency makes it that far) call. Since he presents a chart depicting an inflationary spiral leading to economic collapse, I would also just like to present this chart from Financial Sense depicting a deflationary spiral:

Good job, keep the good articles coming and I hope everyone heeds your “Warning!”


The mainstream media and government are communicating that the economy is on a positive track toward recovery while downplaying the likelihood of another economic catastrophe similar or worse than that experienced in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009. In actuality, there is a significant chance that the U.S. will experience a severe economic collapse, beyond what has already been experienced, either this year or within the next few years. If there is a perceived, sustainable economic rebound before this happens, do not be fooled - the underlying economic problems still exist and will likely eventually surface in economic collapse.

This following analysis further explores this warning by describing:

  1. The 4 key reasons an economic collapse is likely imminent
  2. Why these 4 reasons make the economy vulnerable
  3. Warning signs and triggers to monitor to foresee a collapse before it happens
  4. What can result from an economic collapse
  5. Ideas for preparation

The 4 Key Reasons an Economic Collapse is Likely Imminent

  1. The U.S. has unprecedented, massive amounts of current and coming debt.
  2. Foreign countries have experienced their own crises, and they cannot offer added levels of debt funding for the U.S. Even if they could, they are unlikely to do so.
  3. Productivity is declining, and everything the government is doing is further hurting productivity.
  4. The U.S. is printing unprecedented, massive amounts of money and no longer has an ability to control inflation and deflation.

1. The U.S. has unprecedented, massive amounts of current and coming debt.

  1. Over $11.4 trillion in current debt and growing
  2. $1.8 trillion deficit in current budget - $9.3 trillion over next decade (likely to be higher)
  3. Outstanding future debt of $43 trillion to $102 trillion from entitlements
  4. Debt Comparison to U.S. GDP

A. Over $11.4 trillion in current debt and growing

U.S. federal debt is now over $11.4 trillion. As this graph is slightly outdated, you can imagine how far off the graph the line will need to go to chart the increase.

B. $1.8 trillion deficit in current budget - $9.3 trillion over next decade (likely to be higher)

The $3.6 trillion budget most recently passed is estimated to incur a $1.8 trillion deficit. The deficit is estimated to add up to $9.3 trillion over next decade. These are estimates by the government, but they include economic assumptions that have already been exceeded.

For example, the budget assumes a max of 8.1% unemployment. We are now at 9.4% unemployment. This means the deficit will most likely be larger than projected.

Even with the current estimates, the deficit line on the outdated graph below will go far off the chart. Also, the federal debt discussed above (bullet "A") will increase over time by the amount of the deficit.

C. Outstanding future debt of $43 trillion to $102 trillion from entitlements

The U.S. has made long-term commitments to fund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Because of the increase in the retiring Baby Boomer population and the continuing increase in medical costs in the U.S., the demand on these payments is also increasing.

Additionally, the U.S. government borrows from already-collected funds to undertake additional spending, adding to the entitlement funding problem.

The coming added debt estimates from entitlements are as low as $43 trillion and as high as $102 trillion. To put these debt levels in context, total U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is about $14.1 trillion and falling.

Graph from a 2008 U.S. Government Accountability Office report

As the above U.S. Government Accountability Office graph is outdated from 2008, here are a few important points to note:

  1. The graphed values are based on the $43 trillion low-end estimate as of 2008. There are several other estimates all the way up to $102 trillion.
  2. Since this graph was created, there are already significant increases required given the recently reported acceleration of the social security shortfall.
  3. Increasing interest rates beyond 2008 projected levels are likely to add to the debt beyond what is stated here.
  4. Likely slower GDP growth will increase the percentage of GDP stated here.

Healthcare reform is an attempt to ease the blow of the coming Medicare debt tsunami. While it is possible that this will have some medium-term effect on the debt outlay (to the detriment of healthcare quality, of course), on the contrary it is also quite possible that it will quickly add cost/debt, and regardless, the timing for these changes to take effect will have little impact for several years.

D. Debt Comparison to U.S. GDP

Below is a government-created graph of U.S. public debt (i.e. not including intragovernmental holdings, which bring the current debt total to $11.4 trillion) projections as a percent of GDP through the coming decades.

Graph from a 2008 U.S. Government Accountability Office report

As the above U.S. Government Accountability Office graph is outdated from 2008, here are a few important points to note:

  1. We have already exceeded debt that is 50% of GDP and we are moving quickly past this level given our unexpectedly large current and projected budget deficits.
  2. The data line must be shifted significantly to the left given the recently reported acceleration of the social security shortfall.

  3. Increasing interest rates beyond 2008 projected levels are likely to add to the debt beyond what is stated here.
  4. Likely slower GDP growth will increase the debt percentage of GDP stated here.

2. Foreign countries have experienced their own crises, and they cannot offer added levels of debt funding for the U.S. Even if they could, they are unlikely to do so.

The issuance of U.S. Treasury securities is how the government gets loans to fund its spending activity beyond what it collects in taxes. If you buy a Treasury, you are giving the government a loan, which it has to pay back to you with interest. About half of public-owned government debt is held by foreign creditors.

The 3 most significant U.S. debt holders are Europe (European Union and UK), Japan, and China. Japan and China make-up almost 50% of foreign held U.S. Treasurys at 21% and 24% respectively. It is unlikely that these lenders will continue funding U.S. debt to its requirements.

Largest Holders of U.S. Debt - U.S. Treasury (2009)

The 2 key reasons why the U.S. is losing support from its debt holders are:

  1. Countries are experiencing their own crises and funding (and having trouble funding) their own stimulus
  2. Countries do not like our currency devaluation as it hurts the value of the return on their U.S. Treasury investments.

Take a look at the recent status of the larges U.S. creditors:


Several EU countries and Russia are significant holders of U.S. debt. All of these countries have their hands full with economic problems in their own countries and with countries for which they are responsible within the EU. Take a look at the current landscape in Europe.

Countries in Europe that have recently collapsed or are on the brink of collapse:

- Iceland (collapsed)
- Latvia (collapsed)
- Russia (on brink)
- Hungary (on brink)
- Ukraine (on brink)
- Additional Eastern Europe countries (on brink)

In recent time as Eastern European countries have attempted to emerge as viable economies they have become significant borrowers from Western Europe. As Eastern Europe feels pain, the banks and economies of Western Europe feel pain as well.

Failure to save East Europe will lead to worldwide meltdown - Telegraph (2009)

World Agenda: Eastern Europe's economic collapse stalks the West - Times Online (2009)

Eastern Europe's Economic Crash - Business Week (2009)

In addition to Russia's severe economic struggles, they are signaling a move away from the U.S. dollar:

Russia to propose new reserve currency at G20 - Reuters (2009)

Russia Warns Against Relying on Dollar - New York Times (2009)

Russia plans to reduce U.S. Treasury holdings in its reserves - MarketWatch (2009)

While all Western Europe countries are struggling, here are a few noteworthy economic situations currently unfolding:


Will Britain go bankrupt? - MoneyWeek (2009)

George Soros: Britain may have to seek IMF rescue - Times Online (2009)


Germany's slump risks 'explosive' mood as second banking crisis looms - The Telegraph (2009)


Spain's Economic Outlook Grimmest in Europe - New York Times (2009)


Is Ireland fated to be another Iceland? - Guardian News (2009)

Celtic Tiger tamed as economy collapses - The Independent (2009)

Ireland is ECB's sacrificial lamb to satisfy German inflation demands - The Telegraph (2009)


Switzerland threatened with bankruptcy - CreditWritedowns (2009)

Japan (holds 21% of foreign held U.S. Treasurys)

Japan: Worst crisis since war's end - CNN (2009)

Japanese exports plunge by nearly 50% - Guardian News (2009)

Japanese GDP falls at biggest rate since 1955 - MSNBC/Associated Press (2009)

China (holds 24% of foreign held U.S. Treasurys)

China is the largest creditor for the U.S. The country is currently growing at close to half the projected pace before the crisis. The lifeblood of their economy (exports) is declining rapidly, and unemployment is rising quickly.

China exports down 25% - Washington Post (2009)

China Puts Joblessness for Migrants at 20 Million - New York Times (2009)

ADB Cuts China 2009 GDP Forecast On Global Crisis - Wall Street Journal (2009)

China is making loud signals about the declining value of their U.S. Treasury holdings, and backing up their words with consistent moves from long-term treasury holdings to short-term treasury holdings. They are also quite vocal about the need for the world to move away from the U.S. dollar to a new global currency.

Wen Voices Concern Over China's U.S. Treasuries - The Wall Street Journal (2009)

China Takes Aim at Dollar - The Wall Street Journal (2009)

China pushes SDR as global super-currency - Reuters (2009)

A 'Copper Standard' for the world's currency system? - The Telegraph (2009)

China's gold reserves jump, making nation No. 5 holder - MarketWatch (2009)

China's central bank frets over Fed bond purchases - MarketWatch (2009)

China's Short-Term Treasury Binge - The Wall Street Journal (2009)

China is quickly diversifying their investments away from the U.S. so that they do not have so much dependence on exports to the U.S. and the declining value of their U.S. Treasury holdings. They are doing this by investing in other country's tangibles and through focusing more on growing their own domestic economy.

China said to mull buying oil with foreign reserves - MarketWatch (2009)

China Starts Investing Globally - New York Times (2009)

China's shopping spree - The Independent (2009)

China overtakes the US as Brazil's largest trading partner - The Telegraph (2009)

Brazil Turns to China to Help Finance Oil Projects - The Wall Street Journal (2009)

Most recent statistics show China's holdings of U.S. Treasurys now likely at nearly half of China's GDP. Given the country's troubled economic situation in the crisis, signals of looking for a U.S. dollar alternative, and the diversification of their investments into other country's tangibles and their own domestic economy, China is not a reliable source for ongoing elevating levels of U.S. debt.

3. Productivity is declining, and everything the government is doing is further hurting productivity.

Economic productivity is were value is created, which enables the government to collect the money it requires (i.e. in the form of taxes) to pay for its spending and debt. Additionally, productivity enables U.S. citizens to grow their savings and makes them more likely to invest the savings in U.S. Treasurys (i.e. debt). In our current situation, not only is productivity declining, but the government is overwhelmingly hurting the ability for productivity to grow at a pace that would allow our debt to be managed.

Signs of declining productivity:

-GDP is declining

-Corporate earnings are down

-Layoffs/unemployment is up

-Productivity centers like automotives and manufacturing suffering

-Venture capital is suffering

-Private equity is suffering

-Mergers & acquisitions (M&A) and IPOs are suffering

-Technology, biotech, and other cutting edge industries are suffering

-Exports are suffering

-Growing population of retiring baby boomers

-Low international competitiveness in education; not in PISA top 20 of math, science and reading

-Personal and business savings are low

-Personal and business debt is stretched

What government is doing to hurt productivity for the long-term:

-Causing regulatory uncertainty through bailouts and changed rules/laws

-Protectionist policies are being implemented

-Tax structure hurts productivity - corp taxes, increases on cap gains, talk of national sales tax, etc.

-Attacking property rights/contracts

-Crowding out investment and industry with special public works projects

-Nationalization of industries - auto, banks, and more to come

-Welfare and unemployment entitlements expansion

-Unionism is getting more government support

-Implementing stifling health care reform

-Economically invalid environmental approach

-Adding equal opportunity laws

4. The U.S. is printing unprecedented, massive amounts of money and no longer has an ability to control inflation and deflation.

There is a common fallacy that the definition of inflation is rising or higher prices. Instead, inflation is actually an increase in the supply of money to a level that devalues the currency's purchasing power. Higher prices are not inflation, but a result of inflation; when there is more money to buy the same amount of stuff, the prices of the stuff rise. Inflation harms the economy as it causes the following:

  1. Errors in economic calculation (organizational planning) for entrepreneurs
  2. Products and services become more expensive before incomes can rise to afford them.
  3. Dilution of the value of the dollar.

As described above, the U.S. cannot rely on other countries' or our own productivity to manage our exorbitant debt. Rather than allowing defaults on this debt, the government is resorting to unprecedented amounts of money printing:

  1. $10.5 trillion committed, $2.7 trillion spent for crisis bailouts
  2. $1.2 trillion Fed balance sheet expansion - expected to expand to $4.5 trillion by September '09. Much of the purchases for this expansion are illiquid, long-term assets that are not easily sold when the money supply needs to be reined in as inflation escalates.
  3. Included is $300 billion dollars for Treasury bond purchases (i.e. quantitative easing) expected to expand to $1 trillion in purchases, especially since interest rates are quickly becoming uncontrollable.

Here is the recent history of the Fed's balance sheet:

Here are the implications for the monetary base:

You may ask yourself why we haven't yet experienced inflation given all this money printing. What is actually happening is we are experiencing less deflation (contraction of the money supply, and appreciation of the dollar) than we otherwise would have without the money printing. Any kind of economic stabilization in the near future would cause the excess reserves (held-back credit) now in the banking system to quickly infiltrate throughout the economy and inflation would ensue. However, it's important to note that economic stabilization is not a requirement for inflation to surface and we could see inflation before any kind of recovery.

Why These 4 Reasons Make the Economy Vulnerable

Imagine if a guy named John took on a bunch of debt above the level of income and potential income that would allow the debt to be paid off. John then tries to float the debt by taking on new debt to pay off old loans hoping eventually he would make enough income to pay off all of the debt - except his income continues to decline. Eventually creditors would not be willing to lend to him and he would default and need to start over.

This is the state of the U.S. government, except for one difference; the government's ability to print money to eventually pay off the debt at a diluted value. However, this makes the government's economic situation worse off than John, who would have defaulted. The below information more directly outlines the current U.S. situation.

  1. Because of the government's bailout philosophy and long-term policy plans, U.S. debt will continue to grow larger. Eventual rising interest rates will add to this debt load.
  2. The debt has to be paid off - If it is not paid off, we will default and collapse.
  3. Productivity and taxes normally pay off debt, but we are becoming less productive and tax revenues are declining rapidly. Also, dramatic tax increases to cover debt are counterproductive to the economy. Even a good case turnaround in productivity is not likely to be enough to service the rapid debt growth.
  4. We are resorting to printing money to pay off the debt, but this devalues the dollar, which hurts our creditors when they are paid back with money of less value than they lent out.
  5. Major creditors, such as China and Russia, are swiftly switching their policies to have less dependence on the U.S. dollar.

These factors alone can cause a flee from the U.S. dollar (i.e. a currency crisis), which would have a catastrophic effect on the economy. In the near term, it is not likely that a given country would make a bold move to run from the dollar as it would hurt their own economy to harm one of their most important customers (i.e. U.S. imports). However, much international tension has built during the crisis that makes the international community more likely to run away from the dollar in the case of an unknown event (e.g. another financial catastrophe, a natural catastrophe, a significant terrorist attack, another war, etc.)

On top of these factors and despite what the mass media is communicating about "green shoots" and economic recovery, the U.S. economic situation is not getting better. There are several economic factors existing and forming that could cause an exacerbation of the current situation to trigger a full breakdown of our economic system.

Status of the Banking System

At the core of our economic system is the banking system. Despite the mass media and government's claims, the banks are in bad shape with significant threats to their survival approaching in the near future:

1. The government's bank stress test results were not good, but still depicted U.S. banks as much healthier than they actually are.

a. The criteria used for the worst case economic scenario was about as bad as the current economic situation, and will most likely be surpassed within the year.

b. Recently changed accounting rules propped up the financial condition of the banks to favor better test results.

c. The banks argued aggressively with the government to release better than actual results so that shareholders and customers would not lose faith.

d. The tests were performed in a short period of time. Past bank stress tests have historically been quite inaccurate, and that is under testing processes performed over significantly longer time periods.

e. The tests focused on 19 banks making up about 70% of the banking industry. The other 30%, which are smaller more localized banks, face different kinds of current and approaching problems.

2. The banks need more capital to survive, hence the government bailouts and capital-raise requirements. The government estimates the banks will need about $600 billion to cover approaching losses. Given this total and the allotment to each loss category, it is highly likely that the estimate will miss the mark by hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars. Several significant problems that have not yet hit the banks and were underrepresented in the stress tests are:

a. Residential Mortgages - estimated $1.1 trillion to $2.6 trillion in losses approaching from non-subprime Alt-A and Option ARM mortgages. Take a look at the below Credit Suisse graph to see the magnitude of resets approaching.

b. Commercial Real Estate - estimated $1 trillion+ losses starting in 2009 through 2013; 60% of commercial real estate lending comes from non-stress-test banks (smaller/regional banks)

c. Corporate loans and bonds - estimated $390 billion in losses to come

d. Credit card and auto loans - estimated $350+ billion in losses to come; most of the losses by 2010

e. Leveraged buyout (LBO) exposure - several hundred billion dollars in likely private equity leveraged buyout losses stemming from $1.4 trillion in deals made in 2006 and 2007

f. Interest rate swaps (IRS) - these derivatives add several trillion dollars of exposure in the event of volatile and/or rising interest rates.

Note: The TALF and other government programs are supposed to help stifle the blows from the coming residential and commercial real estate losses. However, so far the TALF has been extremely ineffective. Less than $20 billion out of $1 trillion has been activated because the associated underlying assets are not deemed as good investments. Additionally, most of the key approach through these programs is to support the asset-backed securities and to refinance risky loans. The ability to refinance is highly problematic with dramatically declining residential and commercial real estate values, let alone rising interest rates.

The diagram below depicts how the underlying problems are likely to play out within the banking sector, a current linchpin to the U.S. economy.

Diagram 1: Likely Progression of the U.S. Banking Sector and its Economic Impact

Below is further explanation of the above diagram:

  1. Given the banks current conditions and coming wave of losses (residential real estate, commercial real estate, LBOs, etc) described above the diagram, the banks will likely need to be nationalized as the government will not allow them to collapse.
  2. This will be done by converting bank debt to equity and diluting non-government shareholders.
  3. This does not remove the underlying asset and capitalization problems. Instead, the government will print money and take on more debt to cover the losses.
  4. The money printing and increased debt supply will cause a natural rise in interest rates (i.e. to drive demand to buy U.S. debt) and decline of the dollar. If higher interest rates stifle the ensuing inflation, they will also further hurt the economy (e.g. causes more defaults, harder for lending, etc). If inflation continues despite higher interest rates, hyper-inflation is likely to ensue causing an economic collapse.

Other Noteworthy Factors

  1. California (13% of U.S. GDP), New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and other states are having multi-billion dollar budget deficit problems because of rapidly declining tax revenue and over-spending. If this doesn't lead to further bailouts (and therefore more money printing and/or debt), their infrastructures and economies will further breakdown before a leaner spending structure can emerge.
  2. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation has a $33.5 billion dollar deficit (tripled in the last six months). They also estimate that the auto sector has $77 billion in underfunded liabilities, with $42 billion not funded at all. Pension breakdown is likely to continue to rise with state pension stress rising and as the auto sector triggers additional pension cancellation in other sectors.
  3. Obviously rising unemployment, expiring unemployment benefits, prematurely rising interest rates, rising oil prices, and a weakening stock market will only exacerbate and add to the banking and broader economic problems outlined.

The banking and economic conditions, combined with the U.S. debt situation and money-printing practices, can lead to economic breakdown or more money printing to stave off the economic breakdown. The latter is the more likely case given the government's economic philosophy and direction during the crisis. However, this strategy only delays the inevitable as the underlying problems still exist. The resulting catch-22 of inflation and rising interest rates are what can cause catastrophe.

The economic dangers of inflation were touched on in an earlier section, but there are also several significant economic dangers of spiking interest rates:

  1. Loans (personal and business) based on adjustable rates are more likely to default or become more difficult to service.

  2. People and businesses are less likely to borrow or be able to borrow, which can actually be a good thing, but slows the economy in the short-term.
  3. The interest on budget deficits and the national debt increases, adding significantly to the country's debt load.
  4. Interest rate swaps (i.e. hundreds of trillions of dollars in derivatives) run risk of default.

The U.S. interest rate and inflation conundrum is unavoidable as debt is too large, productivity is too low, and money printing is our way of remedying the situation. The U.S. is vulnerable to an economic collapse through spiking interest rates, extremely high inflation (i.e. hyperinflation), or both spiking interest rates and extremely high inflation. The below diagram depicts the dangerous spiral.

Diagram 2: Inflationary Spiral Toward Collapse

Unprecedented Situation

Because of America's great history and foundations of patriotism, many have said that we've been through this before, the country is resilient, we've always figured it out, and we will again. Positive thinking can certainly work wonders, but it is also important to not let it cloud the logic behind the critical nature of the current U.S. situation. The U.S. has been a great country, but history shows that even great countries can fail.

As the first several graphs on this page depict, the U.S. is in a situation of unprecedented debt, deficits, and money printing. Additionally, the recent economic crisis has triggered problems in several sectors, and there are new, large problems on the horizon. All of this while policy direction shows little sign of an ability to fuel significant economic growth that might solve U.S. debt problems and cushion the coming economic blows.

The comparison has been made of our current situation to Japan's "lost decade" or the U.S. Great Depression with the assumption that this crisis likely can't exceed the pain of those periods. However, there are many differences in today's U.S. economic situation that remove much of the relevance of a comparison. Aside from these differences, key underlying factors that spared Japan and the U.S. from a severe economic collapse were:

  1. Japan had high savings rates and high demand for their exports (core to their economy) from healthy countries elsewhere. Although Japan did not experience a severe collapse, 20 years later their stock market is still around 80% lower than its peak before their crisis and they are experiencing continued economic stagnation.
  2. In the Great Depression and different from today's status, the U.S. had:
    1. High savings rates
    2. Excellent productivity increases to fuel the move out of the depression
    3. Countries with the wherewithal to purchase a strong base of exports from a key producer
    4. No weighty entitlement programs hanging over to add gargantuan debt levels to large preexisting debt
    5. High proportion of high character citizens that were not reliant on entitlement programs and better knew the value of hard work

Scenarios for the U.S. economy:

The conditions described to this point are enough to cause a severe economic catastrophe. However, the recent crisis combined with the current monetary policy direction, add extra elements to the equation that make catastrophe more likely.

Scenarios #1 and #2 below both stem from the Fed's plan to inflate (increase the money supply to cover the output gap) its way out of the crisis and eventually pull back the money supply once the economy begins to grow. The Fed knows it must rein in the money supply once growth begins, because if they do not, inflation will become uncontrollable. It is important to note that this has never worked in the past without experiencing heavy economic pain. However, the main problem with the Fed's current situation (unlike past crises and inflationary periods) is that they have virtually no ability to pull back. The Fed cannot effectively sell its balance sheet assets to rein in the money supply because:

  1. The political nature of the assets they have purchased and are propping up
  2. The long-term nature of the assets they have purchased
  3. The political nature of forcing interest rates up to appropriate levels

Even if they could sell off significant enough levels of balance sheet assets and increase interest rates to rein in money, an economic breakdown would follow because of the newly removed support of the latest grown asset bubbles within the economy.

Here are possible scenarios for the U.S. economy:

Scenario #1: Hyperinflation

Hyperinflation is the dramatic devaluing of the currency in the case of a mishandled money supply increases by the central bank. This has happened many times in many countries in recent and distant history, and is most likely when a country has a fiat money system (currency backed by no assets), a lack of confidence in the government, and significant national debt that the country cannot manage to service. To understand the conditions that lead to hyperinflation and the results that stem from it take a look at the hyperinflation periods experienced by Zimbabwe, Argentina, Brazil, Germany, and others. Once hyperinflation begins, government tools used to fight it may stop the process, but deep economic pain is not avoided. As outlined at the beginning of this section, the Fed has put itself in a unique situation in which these tools are unlikely to be effective.

Scenario #2: Deflationary spiral

As the Fed continues to put trash onto its balance sheet (which it has continually done during this crisis) and prices rise from inflation, there can come a point where the collapsing asset prices of the Fed's purchases will cause a panic for lenders (people and countries) to sell those assets at the highest possible price - getting their dollars back before the asset prices fall. As the economy prior to this scenario will be in pain from higher prices, there will be no production to replace the perceived value of the Fed balance sheet. The Fed will not be able to meet this elevated demand. Dollars would be quickly sucked out of the market causing them to spike in value (the opposite of inflation). Global currencies in turn collapse with the increase of the dollar and exports are halted. Locally, as the dollar rises dramatically, prices collapse and borrowing is stopped making the economy motionless. [Arbitrary Vote came aware of this particular deflationary scenario through an article by Karl Denninger of the Market Ticker blog]

Scenario #3: Long term stagnation and economic deterioration

The government's bailout and money printing policies distort pricing, hinder economic calculation, perpetually increase interest rates, cause fascist corruption, and leave no ability for genuine economic productivity to increase as entrepreneurs and businesses are discouraged from participating in the economy. Ultimately this is likely to create an environment that makes one of the above collapse scenarios more likely, but stagnation and slow decline can last for many years if not decades.

Scenario #4: Another economic boom and more dramatic bust

In the unlikely event that the Federal Reserve succeeds at credit expansion to turn the economy back to significant growth, the new growth will be based on the same artificial fundamentals as our recent two bubbles - the dot com bubble and the housing bubble. A new bubble would be larger and more far reaching than ever and would burst harder than ever, sure to break what should have been allowed to break during the last two bursts, but with added problems from the most recent government remedies.

Scenario #5: War

The worst case scenario, and hopefully the least likely, is war. Throughout history times of economic stress have spurred on wars for various reasons (protectionism, government breakdown and disorder, desperation, the belief that it is an economic net positive, etc).

Scenario #6: Sudden revolutionary breakthrough to avoid collapse

All of the above scenarios are doom and gloom scenarios. Unfortunately that is the reality of the situation. However, there is a reason for hope no matter how unlikely this scenario may be to transpire. A revolutionary breakthrough, similar in economic magnitude to the industrial revolution or the information revolution, could ignite powerful, genuine growth that would allow the U.S. to grow its way out of its dire circumstances. We have no way of knowing if this will take place, but a couple possibilities might be an artificial intelligence revolution or a breakthrough in a ubiquitous energy source, such as cold fusion.

Warning Signs and Triggers to Monitor to Foresee a Collapse Before it Happens

One event or a combination of several events can signal or trigger an economic collapse. Below are several events to keep an eye on to gauge the likelihood of a collapse:

An strong increase of treasury yields/interest rates - 10-year bonds are used to set mortgage rates. The Fed has tried to suppress these rates through expanding the Fed balance sheet and quantitative easing. Rates dropped shortly after announcing their plans, but have risen against their will since. A strong move above 4 or 5% on the 10-year yield could signal the abandonment of faith in U.S. Treasurys, or the ability for the U.S. to pay back the loans with money of held value. A spike in this rate can trigger a run on treasuries and a stifling of the economy. Additionally, the 1-month T-bill spiking above the current 0-.25% level could have a harmful effect.

A failed treasury auction - Throughout the year, the Fed holds auctions to sell Treasurys so that it may borrow money to fund the budget deficit. There can come a time when the supply of those Treasurys is so high and demand for them so low that not all treasuries offered are sold. This is a failed auction. We have already had a few auctions this year that did not fail, but interest rates on the treasuries had to be raised to entice people to participate, which sends signals that U.S. debt is not very attractive. If an auction were to fail, the consequences could be a run on the U.S. dollar.

A U.S. debt rating downgrade - The credit ratings agencies (Moody's, S&P, Fitch) rate U.S. treasurys just as they would any loan. The U.S. has long held a AAA rating on its debt. A downgrade of the U.S. credit rating would send a loss of confidence to its creditors and potential creditors which could cause rates to rise and an abandonment of the dollar.

A strong drop in the U.S. dollar index - A declining value of the U.S. dollar is a sign that inflation (the increase in the supply of money) is increasing and confidence is being lost in the currency. A strong dip in value could cause an abandonment of the dollar.

A bank holiday - Although unlikely given the potential for bank nationalization, a bank holiday could be ordered if the government believes the public has lost confidence in the banks and fears a run on the bank deposits. Bank business would be halted for a day or so to allow the government to absorb or prepare for potential losses.

Bank nationalization - Given the high probability of U.S. banks experiencing losses beyond existing losses and those projected through the stress tests, the government has put in place triggers to convert bank debt to equity. This is the technical way of saying that the government is taking increased ownership in the banks under the premise that it will instill confidence and health in the banking system. This process will be accompanied with the announcement that the ownership will only be temporary, but the magnitude of the situation makes this highly unlikely. As Diagram 1 above depicts, nationalization does not solve the underlying problems and can lead to a worsened economic situation.

Another economic boom - If a collapse does not happen first, eventually the Fed's massive money printing and credit expansion could artificially boost economic indicators and GDP. Given the likelihood that this would reach all parts of the economy (i.e. rather than just housing or a given sector) the size of the unjustified over-investment could lead to a much more powerful and deep economic bust.

Other economic signs and triggers - In conjunction and in addition to the signs and triggers outlined above, significant stress in the following economic areas could contribute to or trigger an economic collapse:

  • Commercial real estate defaults
  • Alt-A and Option ARM residential mortgage defaults
  • Credit cards and auto loan default increases
  • Life insurance company struggles from falling stock market
  • Private equity problems from past leveraged buyouts
  • Retail struggles
  • Oil prices rising
  • Food shortages from recent record droughts around the world
  • Default on commodities futures contracts
  • Interest rate swap defaults from rising interest rates
  • Pension collapse
  • Corporate bond defaults
  • Municipal bond defaults
  • State fiscal collapses
  • Collapse of Eastern European countries or other countries to spur contagion

Unknown disaster - Other events that could trigger economic turmoil in the economy's vulnerable state are:

  1. Natural disaster (hurricane, earthquake, flooding, pandemic, etc)
  2. Unnatural disaster (terrorist attack, escalation of international tensions such as Afghanistan, North Korea, Iran, etc)

What Can Result From an Economic Collapse?

Imagine if the money you have in your savings account, checking account, or U.S. treasurys, which you thought were all safe places save your hard-earned money, lost half or even 90% of their value overnight. This is exactly what can happen in our current situation. This can have a catastrophic effect on the economy and social well-being.

Further economic deterioration leads to rising unemployment. Unemployment benefits eventually run out. The government has added an extension to unemployment benefits, but hundreds of thousands of people are passing the time limit of the extension. People will have devalued dollars and in many cases no income or hope of income at all.

Historically this type of financial stress on a mass basis often leads to civil unrest. In an extreme economic crisis, unrest is possible in the U.S. because of:

  1. General desperation from extreme financial hardship
  2. Racial tensions because Obama ratings may drop and blame could be placed – Various races may attempt to place blame on one another.
  3. Class tension because of a large percentage of the population receiving entitlements and bailouts (handouts) while producing nothing. Entitlement and bailout outlays are increasing while ability to produce/create is decreasing.
  4. Class tension because handouts will eventually have to be cut back which will cause more stress and anger
  5. Class tension because of the mass perception of corporate and executive greed

Ideas for Preparation

With so many possibilities of how the U.S. economic situation can play out, it is difficult to know exactly how to prepare. Below are some ideas that may be helpful as you evaluate your own personal situation.

Protect your finances

A major challenge will be to protect your finances, especially since the normal safe-havens of treasurys, money markets, and cash are no longer safe. Verify what has been written within this webpage with other sources and evaluate your own situation accordingly. Arbitrary Vote is not offering investment advice, but here are a few ideas to help you think about such an unfamiliar situation:

  • Don't play the stock market unless you are intimately familiar with the economic situation and investing. There will be continued extreme volatility in the markets and a lot of known and unknown triggers for industries to collapse, while very few winners will emerge. PE ratios are still quite high. The stock market will rise if there is inflation, but the business and currency values won't. For example, Zimbabwe had the greatest performing stock market in the world during their hyperinflation, yet their economy was in complete collapse.

  • Diversify your investments. Precious metals such as gold and silver are strong with uncertainties in inflation, government, and currencies. Have at least a little gold and silver in your house as a safety fund. Also various other commodities do well in economic crises. Food/agriculture commodities could be a nice idea as they usually do quite well in inflationary environments, and food shortages are likely to be prevalent in the near future as recent major droughts and population growth are effecting food supply and demand.
  • Minimize your fixed income investment exposure, such as money markets, CD's, savings accounts, or U.S. Treasurys. The amount of money you have in cash should be minimal and as liquid as possible so that you can move money to safer places in anticipation of a crisis. Note that you want to try to figure out where to put your money before the crisis happens, as once it happens, it will be too late as your money will have already lost its value.
  • If you have significant debt, there are two sides to the payoff argument. One side says pay off debt as quickly as possible so that you don't run the risk of it becoming more expensive in a deflationary environment or with rising interest rates. The other side says don't feel the need to pay off quickly as debt becomes cheaper for you as inflation kicks in; plus the government's policy moves are likely to eventually give your debt relief anyway. Evaluate your unique personal situation and come to the best conclusion for yourself.
  • If relevant, get pension dollars as quickly as possible, or at least a strong understanding of your pension's status and funding source. Pensions are extremely pained and may not be reliable sources of income.
  • If relevant, accelerate receiving social security payments. Social security is extremely pained and a run can be made on it. Additionally, the government is likely to decrease payment amount and extend the point at which benefits may be claimed. Aside from the payment amount decreasing, the value of the dollar amount will decrease because of inflation.
  • Thinking of buying a house? Housing prices may still have a long way to go down for the following reasons:
  1. Foreclosures are still rising.
  2. Another heavy wave of defaults is on the way from non-subprime Option ARM and Alt-A mortgages.
  3. In many cases where the Option ARM and Alt-A problems don't cause foreclosure, they will cause early sales that will add to inventory and/or push prices down further.
  4. Many are leaving major residential real-estate states such as California, Florida, Michigan, New York, etc adding to inventory and/or hurting prices in those areas.
  5. Layoffs are continuing.
  6. Interest/mortgage rates are rising.

  7. Loans are harder to get considering interest rates and bank reluctance.

  8. The government's activity is artificially propping up housing prices (even though prices are still declining).

  9. The banks will eventually have to start moving foreclosed assets off of their books at lower prices or they will face bankruptcy/nationalization. Both scenarios are not good for housing prices.

This means lowered demand and excess and increasing supply. This translates to falling prices that will take a long time to bottom with a slow turnaround after the bottom. Keep in mind that after Japan's housing bubble and bust in the 80's, housing prices are still about 80% lower than they were at their peak.

This does not mean there aren't still a few decent buys out there. Be sure people are moving to and not away from the area where you are buying, and viewing the purchase as a long-term living investment (as opposed to a 2 or 3 year flip) will likely be your best bet. After all, houses are real and valuable assets that act as shelter and will still be standing even if the surrounding economy takes an unprecedented dive.

Other preparation measures to think through
  • Protect yourself and your family
  • Be aware of increasing crime
  • Self-defense skills could be valuable
  • Owning a gun may be valuable
  • A stock of extra preservable food
  • Communication plans and meeting plans with your family in case of emergency
  • Evaluate your city or region and its demographics, government, and economic situation. An accessible second home or family/friend home as a retreat may be valuable depending on where you live. Additionally, it may make sense to begin evaluating your country in a similar manner. Aside from the potential future safety issues in the U.S., you may be surprised to hear that the country ranks 6th on The Heritage Foundation & Wall Street Journal's Index of Economic Freedom and 36th on the Reporters Without Borders' 2008 Press Freedom Index.
  • Educate yourself - Understanding the situation and the potential outcomes is a major step toward proper preparation. Don't take this website's word for it. Compare mainstream and non-mainstream media and information sources and look at the facts yourself. Investigate economics, political, and financial books, blogs, and websites. A few suggestions are: Meltdown by Tom Woods, Peter Schiff books and blogs, Jim Rogers books and blogs, Ron Paul books and blogs,, etc.

Some of these measures may sound extreme. All of it may not be necessary. However, in this environment, being mentally and physically prepared for the worst case scenario is a wise strategy as anything less, but potentially still harmful, will be easier to deal with.

If you have any questions, thoughts, opinions, ideas, or helpful information, feel free to post or discuss them within the forum. Updates based on new information and the evolving situation will be posted at the bottom of this webpage.

Note: All of the graphs within this report are cited. In the interest of time, much of the other statistics are not. Arbitrary Vote is happy to provide citations and background information on any of this information at your request.

The content on this site [Arbitrary Vote] is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. No material here constitutes investment advice nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are solely your responsibility.

© 2009 Copyright Arbitrary Vote - All Rights Reserved